L/rain
48°
L/rain
Hi 50° | Lo 29°

U.S. Scholars Vote to Boycott Israeli Schools

Dartmouth Professors Hold Varying Viewpoints on Decision

New York — The American Studies Association this week endorsed a boycott of Israeli universities, the largest group of U.S. scholars to do so.

About one-third of the group’s more than 3,800 members voted, approving the boycott by 66 percent. Last April, the smaller Association for Asian American Studies, which has about 800 members, became the first scholarly group in the U.S. to support an academic boycott of Israel.

“The ASA condemns the United States’ significant role in aiding and abetting Israel’s violations of human rights against Palestinians and its occupation of Palestinian lands through its use of the veto in the UN Security Council,” the American Studies Association said in a statement explaining the endorsement.

The vote, which is largely symbolic, is nonetheless a sign of the increasing momentum of the international boycott movement against Israel over its treatment of the Palestinians. While the movement — which presses for boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel — has scored some successes in Europe and elsewhere, it has had far less influence in the United States, Israel’s closest and most important ally.

“The reason this is so significant is that it’s a victory within the United States within a mainstream academic association and it was overwhelmingly supported,” Noura Erakat, a Palestinian-American human rights attorney who is a member of the American Studies Association.

The boycott provoked a range of responses at Dartmouth College, where students and faculty are on winter break. Lewis Glinert, professor of Hebraic Studies and Linguistics, said he sent an email to the ASA lambasting the decision.

“Please be assured that I and every honorable scholar I know will do everything in our power to frustrate the ASA in this sinister assault on academic liberties,” he said in the email to the ASA, which he provided to the Valley News. “The 66 percent of ASA members who endorsed the resolution are ugly heirs of the German and Austrian academics who lent mass support to the rising Nazi party. They will rue their decision and bring down the entire ASA.”

But Russell Rickford, assistant professor of history at Dartmouth, said in a phone interview that suggestions that the boycott is anti-Semitic are off the mark. He said it was an “effective tactic of pro-Israel forces to equate any criticism of Israel with anti-Semitism,” when instead the forces of “racism, bigotry and xenophobia” are at play in Israel’s treatment and occupation of Palestine.

He also rejected criticism that Israel was being “singled out” in a region where there are many countries accused of serious human rights violations.

“Let’s be very clear, it’s very dangerous to draw these false equivalencies between Israel and other countries in the region,” he said. “Israel is a massive power and it is absolutely subsidized and propped up by the ultimate world power. No other country in that region has that status.”

Although he is not an ASA member, he supports the boycott, he said, drawing comparisons between the South African Apartheid and Israeli’s actions toward Palestine.

“I think given the recent death of (Nelson) Mandela, it’s important to remember all of the strategies that were used to resist the Apartheid regime in South Africa,” he said. “It was really an international effort in many respects, a grass-roots effort, and an effort that in which artists, intellectuals, cultural figures (and) students played a huge role … The idea that universities and colleges are simply places where lots of ideas meet and a place where professors simply expose students to two sides of any given issue and leave it at that, that’s a very impoverished view of the mission and the nature of … education itself.”

Israeli officials have denounced the campaign as an attempt to delegitimize the Jewish state. They also argue that companies with ties to states with horrendous human rights records are not similarly targeted. Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor declined comment on Monday’s announcement by the American Studies Association, referring reporters to the Israeli embassy in Washington, which did not comment.

Kenneth Stern of the New York-based American Jewish Committee called the American Studies Association decision “abhorrent.” Stern said he was particularly disturbed by language in the group’s statement accompanying the resolution, comparing Israeli policies to apartheid and referring to the “Zionist settler-colonial project.”

A prominent scholarly group, the American Association of University Professors, condemns boycotts as a violation of academic freedom.

The American Studies Association is asking U.S. universities and academic groups to not work with Israeli institutions, but said it does not violate academic freedom, because it includes individual American scholars who collaborate with Israeli colleagues, “provided they are not engaged in a formal partnership with or sponsorship by Israeli academic institutions.”

In the Palestinian territories, civil society groups launched a boycott-divertment-sanctions campaign against Israel in 2005 and have created a far-flung network of activists, including in Europe and the United States. The impact on Israel’s robust economy has remained largely negligible.

Still, activists say they have changed the tone of the debate.

“It is not anymore a taboo, like it was before,” to call for a boycott, said Luisa Morgantini of Italy, a former vice president of the European Parliament and pro-Palestinian activist. “More and more people are aware of the violation of human rights, and also of the colonization that the Israelis are doing in the land of Palestine.”

While some activists call for a boycott of Israeli companies and institutions, others attempt to target Israel’s settlement enterprise. Close to 600,000 Israelis live in settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. Last week, the Dutch water company Vitens, the largest supplier of drinking water in the Netherlands, decided to cut ties with Israel’s national water carrier over its operations in West Bank settlements.

At the same time, Britain’s overseas trade body issued a warning to firms investing in Israeli settlements, saying ties to the Israeli communities established in the West Bank could be bad for business. Last month, Israel acceded to a European funding ban on projects in the occupied territories by assuring the EU it would not spend money received under a technology-sharing pact in the West Bank or east Jerusalem.

Valley News staff writer Maggie Cassidy contributed to this report. Associated Press writer Karin Laub reported from the West Bank. AP Religion Writer Rachel Zoll reported from New York.

Related

Letter: Forceful Removal of Bedouins

Thursday, January 2, 2014

To the Editor: In this season when we bundle up to go see a Christmas pageant and lovingly set out our family Nativity sets — cows and camels and sheep — we sing again the songs that speak of the wonder of stars and shepherds. The modern-day shepherds include 70,000 Bedouin people living in the Negev who are Palestinian citizens …

Letter: Crisis Is Really an Opportunity

Thursday, January 2, 2014

To the Editor: I must say that I was truly disappointed by the recent article on the largely symbolic, though still disturbing, vote by the American Studies Association to endorse a boycott of Israeli universities. I was not bothered by the fact that 66 percent of the group’s members voted in favor of the boycott, for such is, unfortunately, to …

Letter: Applaud the Boycott of Israel

Monday, January 13, 2014

To the Editor: In her “Boycott of Israel Defies Logic, Morality,” Frida Ghitis fails to identify just what the American Scholars Association (ASA) “boycott of Israeli universities” means. In “Hanlon: Israeli Academics Boycott Wrong,” Valley News reporter Jon Wolper does the same. To me this is basic information necessary to understand the issue. Here’s what Inside Higher Ed reported recently: …