Please support the Valley News during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought the local economy — and many of the advertisers who support our work — to a near standstill. During this unprecedented challenge, we continue to make our coronavirus coverage free to everyone at www.vnews.com/coronavirus because we feel our most critical mission is to deliver vital information to our communities.

If you believe local news is essential, especially during this crisis, we are asking for your support. Please consider subscribing or making a donation today. Learn more at the links below.

Thank you for your support of the Valley News.

Dan McClory, publisher


Barnard lawmaker casts key vote to sustain veto on paid family leave

  • Rep. Randall Szott, D-Barnard, center, confers with House leadership at the speaker’s podium during debate on whether to override Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of a paid family leave program at the Statehouse on Feb. 5, 2020. Szott voted to sustain the governor’s veto. (VtDigger - Glenn Russell)

Published: 2/6/2020 10:08:00 PM
Modified: 2/6/2020 10:07:49 PM

MONTPELIER — Democrats in the Vermont House this week fell one vote short in their attempt to override Gov. Phil Scott’s veto of a paid family leave program, with a Barnard lawmaker who felt the proposal wasn’t robust enough casting a critical vote.

In a major loss for the majority party, which has made passing a mandatory paid family leave program a priority in recent years, the House voted 99-51 on Wednesday in favor of overriding the veto — one away from the 100 needed to pass the bill into law.

Explaining why Wednesday’s override vote failed, House Speaker Mitzi Johnson, D-South Hero, pointed to the “very small number of Democrats and independents” that voted against the measure.

She said that these lawmakers are “not reflecting what Vermonters as a whole are interested in,” and that voters should take that into account when they consider whether to reelect them later this year.

“We talk about having policies to help support a workforce, support aging Vermonters and to bring young people back to Vermont,” Johnson said. “And in November, voters will have a choice to see who has taken every step they can to help build those policies that will create a stronger, healthier future for the state.”

The program would have offered workers 12 weeks off work per year to care for a newborn child and eight weeks to care for an ailing family member.

Four Democrats, four independents and the entire Republican caucus opposed the override.

State Rep. Laura Sibilia, I-West Dover, said she couldn’t vote in favor of the paid leave bill when the Legislature hasn’t prioritized a fix to the state’s health care system — the number one priority of her constituents.

Sibilia said she would support a payroll tax to lower health care costs in the state but not a payroll tax for a paid leave program.

“We have a problem that we haven’t fixed yet,” she said.

State Rep. Linda Joy Sullivan, D-Dorset, who voted against the bill, said she couldn’t support the override because the paid leave program would require employees working jobs that make less than $7,400 to pay into the insurance pool but not allow them to use the benefits.

Sullivan, who earlier this week announced a run for state auditor, also said she had concerns that the Democrats’ proposal would be duplicative of governor’s voluntary paid leave program, which he included in his administration’s bargaining agreement with state employees for 2021 — perhaps leading to Vermonters paying into two programs simultaneously.

“It was heart-wrenching because I really did want a paid family plan,” Sullivan said.

While most Democrats who voted against the paid leave override did so because they believe the program would be too costly, state Rep. Randall Szott, D-Barnard, opposed it because he believes the legislation isn’t robust enough.

Szott complained the paid leave program wouldn’t allow for workers to take time off for personal medical issues, unless they volunteered to pay extra temporary disability insurance.

“They didn’t listen. I told them they didn’t have the votes, and they didn’t listen,” Szott said of Democratic leadership.

Sen. President Pro Tem Tim Ashe, D/P-Burlington, called Szott’s vote on the override a “great frustration.”

“It is disappointing, especially with at least one legislator who believes that if things aren’t precisely the way he wanted then that isn’t good enough,” Ashe said. “And that’s not how major legislation is passed.”

Wednesday’s vote was the first time Democrats in the House have attempted to override a Scott veto since the 2018 election bolstered their numbers in the Statehouse. The last time the party successfully overrode a veto was in 2009, when Democrats overrode then-Gov. Jim Douglas’ vetoes of a state budget and Vermont’s landmark same-sex marriage bill.

Scott vetoed the paid family leave bill last week because it would be funded by a $29 million payroll tax that would fall on workers, unless employers volunteered to offer the benefit.

The governor said he supports paid family leave as long as it isn’t mandated for all workers to take part in the program.

Scott has pitched his own voluntary paid family leave program, which has been included in the administration’s contract with unionized state employees, and could move forward this year. The administration is now searching for a private insurance company that could administer the benefit. Under Scott’s plan, Vermont’s 8,500 state employees would receive six weeks of paid leave, forming an insurance pool that other businesses and employees could join voluntarily.

After Wednesday’s override vote, Republicans said they looked forward to advancing the governor’s paid leave plan.

“I think the whole House would like to see some sort of paid family leave but realized you have to do the voluntary one because people just cannot afford any more taxes,” said House Minority Leader Pattie McCoy, R-Poultney.

Ashe and Johnson said that Democrats won’t give up their push to enact a mandatory paid family leave program, but suggested that bringing forward additional legislation this year probably isn’t in the cards.

“I don’t know what the next step is, but it’s not an issue that is going to go away,” Ashe said.




Valley News

24 Interchange Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784
603-298-8711

 

© 2019 Valley News
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy