Thank you for your interest in and support of the Valley News. We need to raise $60,000 to host journalists Frances Mize and Alex Driehaus for their one-year placements in the Upper Valley through Report for America, a national service program that boosts local news by harnessing community support.

Please consider donating to this effort.

Vermont sees unexpected revenue boost after July tax filings

Published: 7/29/2020 9:50:08 PM
Modified: 7/29/2020 9:50:04 PM

MONTPELIER — The state saw more revenue than expected after residents and businesses filed their 2019 tax returns this month, which will help the state as it weathers the economic strain and budget woes accompanying the COVID-19 pandemic.

As of July 28, the state had received $160 million in additional tax revenue in July. Some $51 million of that will be used to close out the fiscal year 2020 budget, which ended June 30.

But the bulk of it, $109 million, will be carried forward to the current fiscal year, and can be harnessed to help cover a projected $219 million deficit in the state’s general fund — the account that pays for most state government operations.

Taxes are typically due April 15, but this spring the state and federal governments effectively pushed back the deadlines until July 15 because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Adam Greshin, the state’s finance commissioner, said that after the July filings, state revenues came in $25 million higher than officials had projected they would in January, before the pandemic struck.

Greshin presented the latest revenue update to the legislative Joint Fiscal Committee on Wednesday.

He added that checks are still coming in, so this figure is likely to go up in the next week or two.

“Either way you look at it, it’s clear that we have significant fund availability here,” Greshin told the Joint Fiscal Committee. “And I don’t think I’m going out on a limb by saying this was most unanticipated.”

But Greshin warned that this revenue mostly reflects income taxes from 2019, which was a strong year for the economy, and well before the pandemic set in.

“The receipts that we’re seeing that are being paid in July that should have been paid in April reflect what is unquestionably a very strong 2019 calendar year,” Greshin said.

Despite this good news, this revenue still does not come close to covering the deficit the state is facing for fiscal year 2021. Greshin said state government departments will still need to cut their budgets.

“The message is we’re better than our worst fears, but the real impact of COVID on the economy is going to be seen in the year ’20,” said Sen. Ann Cummings, D-Washington, who chairs the committee, referring to the current year.

Tom Kavet, the Legislature’s economist, said that in 2019, the highest earners in the state saw an “extraordinary amount of income” that came across in their personal income payments. The state also saw some large corporate income payments.

“In a strong year like 2019, those sorts of things, that’s the upside potential we expect, and it’s terrific we could realize some of this in a year that it’s really needed,” Kavet said.

A push for federal budget aid

While revenues have recently performed better than expected, fiscal analysts say this trend will not continue.

In fiscal year 2021, the state is expected to see $330 million in revenue losses across all of its funds, according to the latest estimate from the Joint Fiscal Office.

Vermont officials have been pushing Congress and President Donald Trump to approve additional aid for state governments grappling with budget shortfalls because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Since the federal government approved a first major round of funding for states in April, elected officials across the country have been asking the federal government for permission to use the dollars to fill holes in their budgets created by cratering state revenues.

They have also been asking lawmakers to approve additional funding to help states weather their anticipated spending shortfalls.

So far, it has done neither. According to the latest update from the Joint Fiscal Office in June, Vermont will face a loss of $330 million in revenue in the current fiscal year.

U.S. lawmakers are working on the next round of Covid-19 aid, and Republican senators in the GOP-controlled Senate unveiled a $1 trillion plan on Monday that is backed by President Trump.

Under the new relief plans, states could use 25% of the federal dollars they received through the federal Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) in April to fill holes in their budgets. But they could only use the money for this purpose if 25% of the overall CRF dollars were given directly to local governments.

Vermont received $1.25 billion in CRF dollars, but has already spent, or allocated the vast majority of it — just over $1 billion — on a variety of aid packages signed into law by the governor this month. And according to a breakdown of CRF spending, Vermont has directed only $15 million towards local governments.

U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., criticized the proposal from Senate Republicans in a statement Monday.

Sen. Patrick Leahy at a news conference in June 2019. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

“It provides no new funding for state and local fiscal relief to help state and local governments that have been forced to take the reins of pandemic response in the absence of the President,” Leahy said of the proposal.

“Their budgets are stretched to the breaking point as revenues plummet and they struggle to support their people and the public servants on the front lines of this crisis,” he said.

If the Republicans’ plan was enacted, the emergency federal unemployment benefits set to expire at the end of the month would be reduced from $600 per week, to $200 per week, and Americans would receive another $1,200 stimulus check.

But it does not include additional funding for state and local governments, unlike the HEROES Act, a Covid-19 relief bill that passed the Democrat-controlled House in May.

In an interview on Friday, U.S. Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., said that state and local governments need additional funding.

“In the HEROES Act there is $3 billion that would come to the state of Vermont — into our municipalities and towns. That’s absolutely urgent,” Welch said.

“Otherwise, our property taxpayers are going to be crushed. We’re going to be having dramatic cuts in services in our schools and our health care system,” he said.

On Tuesday, Gov. Phil Scott said that he expects the federal government will grant states the ability to use some of their federal dollars they have already received to help make their budgets whole.

But even if it doesn’t, he believes that Vermont will be able to work with the revenue it has.

“We’ll live within our means,” he said during his bi-weekly press conference.

“I’m confident we’ll make it through. It would be nice to have more flexibility,” Scott added.

“I do believe most Republicans and Democrats alike can see the merits in more flexibility, and I think we’ll see that in the next package,” the governor said.

He is less hopeful that Congress will put additional money on the table to help states fix their budget woes. Scott put those odds at “50/50.”

Without additional revenue, or flexibility from the federal government, it’s likely that the state will face budget cuts, and or have to dig into its reserve funds.

The Scott administration proposed an initial round of budget cuts this spring — asking most departments and agencies to cut spending by 2% in the first quarter of the fiscal year, which began July 1.

The budget bill the governor signed last month funds state government only from July to September.

But lawmakers rejected the proposal, and decided to hold off decisions about spending cuts until August, when they will reconvene to pass a budget for the entire year.

Part of the reason lawmakers and the governor agreed to delay the budgeting process until late summer was to wait until the federal government provided more clarity on what kind of additional Covid-19 is coming to the states.

Rep. Kitty Toll, D-Danville, the chair of the House Appropriations Committee, said she hopes that there will be additional funding to help Vermont address its budget gap, or more flexibility with the revenue it already has.

“We have seen reduction in the revenue that’s coming in and we’ve got to continue providing some important services to elderly Vermonters, to children, to families that need help, disabled people, businesses that need help getting started up again,” Toll said this week.

“We’re going to need that support. And we can’t do it on just our own revenue,” she said.

Grace Elletson and Kit Norton contributed reporting.

Valley News

24 Interchange Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784


© 2021 Valley News
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy