Thank you for your interest in and support of the Valley News. So far, we have raised 80% of the funds required to host journalists Claire Potter and Alex Driehaus for their one-year placements in the Upper Valley through Report for America, a national service program that boosts local news by harnessing community support.

Please consider donating to this effort.

Unruly NH crowd forces DHHS to postpone vaccine registry hearing

New Hampshire Bulletin
Published: 9/8/2021 9:49:01 PM
Modified: 9/8/2021 9:49:13 PM

Editor’s Note: This story was first published on New Hampshire Bulletin.

The state Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed a hearing on proposed changes to the vaccine registry on Wednesday after losing control of the room to an unruly crowd of vaccine opponents and privacy rights activists.

Wearing “Live Free or Die” shirts, forgoing masks and carrying “right to privacy” signs, nearly 150 people came to oppose what they see as an expansion of the vaccine registry. They turned angry when the department attempted to enforce the room’s 95-person limit and announced the overflow crowd would wait in the hall for a turn to testify.

The presence of two security officers had no effect. Nor did the department’s offer to hold a second public hearing for people in the hall.

Even at 95 people, the small windowless auditorium was not an ideal setting for a public hearing when the state’s COVID-19 cases are averaging 351 a day. That grew more apparent with almost no one wearing a mask and nearly everyone singing, reciting the Pledge of Allegiance and shouting down department officials.

Seventeen minutes in, Allyson Zinno, administrator of the department’s administrative rules unit, announced the hearing would be rescheduled and held in a larger room. She did not give a date as the crowd cheered and claimed victory.

New Hampshire was the last state in the country to have a vaccine registry when it started one in 2017. Given its contentious history, fierce opposition to the proposed rule changes were not a surprise. In fact, the registry was delayed by two years over objections to the department’s original rules over how people would choose to participate and what information would be recorded.

At the start of Wednesday’s hearing, Zinno said the rules do not expand access to the registry or create a vaccine passport. The crowd wasn’t convinced.

The proposed rule changes are both small, such as clarified definitions, and more substantial, such as the addition of other health records in the registry and documentation when someone asks to be removed from the registry. The process for declining to be included in the registry would stay the same: A health care provider must give a patient a choice to opt out.

The timing of the proposed changes is unclear.

The state is required to review administrative rules every 10 years but can do so more frequently, the department said in response to questions from the Bulletin earlier this week. When asked if these proposed changes are related to COVID-19 or the vaccine, the department said in an email: “These rules apply to the administration of all vaccines, including the COVID-19 vaccine.”

It continued: “The department can also update (rules) as frequently as there are necessary changes.”

The department didn’t respond when asked to clarify whether the pandemic prompted an early review of the rules.

The proposed changes would add a “health screening record.” The department said that would include past history of disease.

“For example,” the department wrote in its email, “if someone has documented proof of immunity to varicella (chicken pox), they do not need to be immunized against varicella.”

The existing rules prohibit health care providers and the state from keeping a record of someone’s decision to be removed from the registry. That would change under the proposed rules.

The department said maintaining the record will allow the health care provider to ensure the patient’s information is not shared with the registry. It will also allow the state to withdraw someone from the registry and ensure no patient information from other health care providers is included.

The department initially said it would be taking written public comment on the proposed changes until Sept. 15. It was unclear Wednesday if it will extend the deadline once it has announced a new date for the public hearing.




Valley News

24 Interchange Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784
603-298-8711

 

© 2021 Valley News
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy