Estate of Woodstock shooting victim sues his slayer's mother

A Vermont State Police Tactical Team member, left, talks with a Windsor County Sheriff's Deputy as police gather at the scene of a shooting death in Woodstock, Vt., on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. (Valley News - James M. Patterson) Copyright Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com.

A Vermont State Police Tactical Team member, left, talks with a Windsor County Sheriff's Deputy as police gather at the scene of a shooting death in Woodstock, Vt., on Tuesday, June 14, 2022. (Valley News - James M. Patterson) Copyright Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com. James M. Patterson

By JOHN LIPPMAN

Valley News Staff Writer

Published: 10-06-2024 7:15 PM

Modified: 10-07-2024 2:38 PM


WOODSTOCK — The estate of a Cornish Flat man who was fatally shot by a friend’s son when he showed up at their home in Woodstock is suing the mother for financial damages.

The civil suit alleges that the mother knew her 45-year-old son had a gun and was at risk of violent behavior and endangered her friend’s life by not warning him about it.

The estate of Dieter Seier is suing June Wilson, whose son, Jay Wilson, shot and killed Seier outside the Wilson’s home on Slayton Terrace in Woodstock on June 14, 2022.  June Wilson had asked Seier to help move her son out of the house, because she was putting it up for sale.

After Jay Wilson shot and killed Seier, 67, he retreated back into the house, where he was later found dead by police with a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

The civil lawsuit, which was filed in Windsor County Superior Court in February, came to light when it was first reported by the Vermont Standard last week.

June Wilson “had a duty to disclose the past dangerous and unsafe behaviors of which she knew or should have known about her son. She also had a duty to disclose the presence of firearms,” the lawsuit alleges, instead telling Seier that “Jay was safe and that he could stay at the home without risk or harm.”

The Seier estate is seeking a jury trial to award compensatory and punitive damages, “in addition to all other relief that the court deems just and equitable.”

Pietro Lynn, a Burlington attorney representing the estate and Shapleigh Smith, a Burlington attorney representing Wilson, both declined to comment.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Threats close one Upper Valley school, bring police to others
Kenyon: Questioning authority is no longer part of curriculum at Dartmouth
Upper Valley athletes buck the trend of single sport specialization
On eve of vote, Pence talks politics at Dartmouth
New Hampshire’s interest and dividends tax – and why it’s a hot campaign issue – explained
By the Way: The perils of Christian nationalism

While residing at his mother’s Slayton Hill house, Jay Wilson “frequently made threats of violence if displeased” and had exhibited behavior that frightened neighbors and others in town, the lawsuit said, which alleges new details in the days and hours leading up to the shooting.

According to lawsuit, June Wilson traveled from her home in Florida on June 1, 2022, with the intent to sell her Woodstock home and change her will. During a meeting at the attorney’s office, Jay Wilson became “angry and threatening” and was ordered to leave the office by the attorney.

Four days later, on June 5, June Wilson contacted Seier, “a friend of longstanding,” and requested his assistance to clean out the house, but didn’t tell him about the incident with her son at the attorney’s office. Jay Wilson also “demanded” his mother split half the proceeds of the house sale with him, the lawsuit said.

In an effort to calm her son, she promised him $50,000 and on June 13 they both went to Peoples United Bank to withdraw the money. Jay Wilson allegedly again acted in such a “threatening and frightening” manner over “not getting enough money from his mother,” scared bank employees, who called police. He left the bank before police arrived and the employees locked the doors because “bank employees were afraid he might come back and perpetuate violence.”

But on the next day, when Seier accompanied June Wilson at her request to the Slayon Hill house, she allegedly had never informed Seier that her son had been “acting irrationally” in the preceding days nor mentioned anything about her son possessing a firearm.

“June failed to disclose important information which would have caused Dieter to reconsider his decision to accompany June. If there had been full disclosure, Dieter would not have come to the home,” the lawsuit alleges.

In June Wilson’s answer to the complaint, she largely denied or “denied as stated” — a legal term rebutting an allegation based on how it is characterized or phrased — and pointedly said she “did not tell Dieter that Jay had firearms because she did not know that Jay had firearms.”

In July, June Wilson’s attorney filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that — apart from allegations or denials — under Vermont law she “had no duty to protect Dieter from the conduct of her adult son,” citing state court cases in support of the argument.

In August, the estate’s attorney, in seeking to deny June Wilson’s motion to dismiss, countered with an argument citing state court cases — including some of the same cases the plaintiffs used in support of their claim — in support of June Wilson’s liability.

The court has not yet ruled on the motions and a hearing date hasn’t been set. 

Contact John Lippman at jlippman@vnews.com.