Please support the Valley News during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought the local economy — and many of the advertisers who support our work — to a near standstill. During this unprecedented challenge, we continue to make our coronavirus coverage free to everyone at because we feel our most critical mission is to deliver vital information to our communities.

If you believe local news is essential, especially during this crisis, we are asking for your support. Please consider subscribing or making a donation today. Learn more at the links below.

Thank you for your support of the Valley News.

Dan McClory, publisher

Column: Too Much Testing, Not Enough Achievement

Wednesday, November 04, 2015
Testing is once again in the news. Test results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress were released across the nation; President Obama and the U.S. Department of Education have supported reductions in testing; and states have been releasing local assessment results. Yet the storyline remains the same: too much testing, not enough student achievement.

In Vermont, we think the story should be more about what we are doing with these test results and a little less about the tests themselves.

Over the past decade or so, federal policy has used student achievement data to judge and sanction schools, teachers and principals. Furthermore, many states have defined teacher and educator quality narrowly in terms of test scores.

The intent of the federal law known as No Child Left Behind is laudable, and we agree that we must commit to ensuring every student has the best quality education we can provide, However, the blunt tools in NCLB threaten faith in public institutions and undermine our ability to serve our children well.

NCLB assumes that employees in our schools need motivation before they will provide for their students. Most of the “motivation” comes in the form of sanctions that, at best, introduce elements of fear and coercion to our educational system.

High-stakes testing also creates perverse incentives for teachers to teach in ways that are antithetical to our vision for equity. Most states are using these test scores to shape employment decisions, and as a result, encourage educators to teach narrowly to the test, so as to boost those scores as much as possible.

High stakes can also penalize good teachers who work with some of our most vulnerable students. If a teacher agrees to teach students whose performance is so far below grade level that their learning can never be captured on the grade level tests, their efforts, no matter how Herculean, will never be evident in test-based performance measures.

These NCLB accountability measures have led educators to question the test and its purposes, and to challenge what they see as unfair measures of their performance.

Under federal law, we are now required to label all our schools “low performing,” because not every single student in every single school scores as “proficient.” If we had gotten a waiver from NCLB, as most states have, we would have been required to make assessment results a part of teacher evaluation. Vermont, however, chose not to use scores to evaluate, hire and fire teachers, who express professional pride in improving performance and don’t want to fear that they might lose their jobs if they don’t inflate scores by teaching in narrow, test-focused ways.

However, federal sanctions on our schools and districts remain, and we worry that this inappropriate use of tests is both eroding their utility as measures of progress and perhaps discouraging some of the learning and innovative thinking we most want to support. As the student representative on the State Board of Education, Rainbow Chen, recently noted, every year we use the tests to tell students, especially English language learners and children growing up in the face of deep adversity, that they are “not proficient” or “not on track for college and careers.” Instead, we could help them mark how much progress they have made and encourage them to strive higher.

Vermont still has educational dilemmas and challenges to resolve. We still have achievement gaps, particularly for students living in poverty. Our schools continue to search for solutions to support students as increasing opioid addiction afflicts some communities. We are struggling to figure out how to encourage some of our rural students to see postsecondary education as a step toward a stronger future for both themselves and their communities. We know that our job is not to prepare students for tests, but to prepare them for a future when humans do what computers can’t do well: creative, innovative work that demands self-direction and judgment.

What we have learned, however, is that we are more likely to solve this problem by working together, rather than looking to blame, sanction or label one another. As a state, we have chosen to pursue a more measured, thoughtful and balanced approach to accountability that is focused on building the professional capabilities of our educators, so they in turn can take better care of our children. And we need a more measured and supportive approach to student achievement that focuses on improving progress and accomplishment, rather than blaming and shaming.

Students and families deserve schools that serve them and their communities well. Our schools and educators deserve policies that respect their contributions and support them in getting better at the most important work in the world: preparing all our children to create a strong future for themselves, the state and the nation.

Rebecca Holcombe is the Vermont secretary of education.

Valley News

24 Interchange Drive
West Lebanon, NH 03784


© 2019 Valley News
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy