Letter: Correction on Size of Budget Cuts

To the Editor:

There was a factual error in a March 2 letter relating to the budgetary effects of sequestration (“A Look at White House’s Numbers”). It was asserted that the required budget cuts would be prorated for this fiscal year and therefore less severe than generally understood.

I would like to quote from the March 1 letter from the Office of Management and Budget to House Speaker John Boehner about what is statutorily required by the “Sequestration Act”: “Because these cuts must be achieved over only seven months instead of 12, the effective percentage reductions will be approximately 13 percent (instead of 7.8% percent) . . . for non-exempt defense programs and 9 percent (instead of 5 percent) . . . for non-exempt nondefense programs.”

Arthur Gardiner



Letter: A Look at White House’s Numbers

Monday, February 25, 2013

To the Editor: Regarding the sequester and the “Twin State Impacts” (Feb. 25): It is my understanding that $85 billion in cuts will not take effect from March through September, contrary to what the Valley News reports, but only a pro rata portion, less than $50 billion. Even with these “cuts,” federal spending this year will be greater than last …

Letter: Measuring the Sequestration Cuts

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

To the Editor: A March 10 letter (“Correction on Size of the Budget Cuts”) stated that my prior letter was factually incorrect when it said that sequestration cuts for the current year would be less than the reported $85 billion. The evidence cited was a letter from the White House Office of Management and Budget to House Speaker John Boehner. …