Clinton Pushes Back Hard On GOP’s Libya Attacks

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.  (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

Washington — In what was likely her final major public appearance as secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton spent yesterday delivering a forceful defense of the Obama administration’s response to the murders of four Americans in Libya last year and praising the commitment of America’s diplomats.

Clinton, who returned to work this month after suffering a concussion and blood clot in early December, spent six hours testifying and answering questions. She started at 9 a.m. before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and ended after 5 p.m. with the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Clinton’s long-awaited testimony provided little in the way of new information about the Benghazi attacks. But confronting her critics and delivering a spirited defense of the administration’s response was essential to the effort to put the tragedy behind her as she leaves a job for which she has received wide praise and contemplates a possible run for president in 2016.

At times, the usually composed Clinton was emotional, choking up as she described meeting the caskets of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and the three other Americans who died in the attack on Benghazi, Libya, last Sept. 11. Occasionally her patience wore thin. After one Republican pressed Clinton on the administration’s shifting explanations for the attack — which it initially described as the result of a protest — she pounded the table.

“What difference, at this point, does it make?” Clinton demanded. “It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again.”

She reiterated that she takes responsibility for what an independent investigation called security lapses and systemic failures within the State Department.

But she rejected all suggestions by Republicans that there had been a cover up in the aftermath of the assault on the temporary post in Benghazi and a nearby annex used by the CIA. She also said she never saw requests for more security in Libya made by Stevens and others.

Controversy over the Benghazi attacks has dogged the administration for months. Republicans accusations that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice gave a misleading description of the events leading up to the attack led her to withdraw from consideration to replace Clinton, opening the door for the nomination of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass..

An investigation by an Accountability Review Board appointed by the State Department faulted the department for security shortcomings and failing to heed warnings about the dangers in Benghazi and elsewhere in Libya.

The board recommended sweeping changes in security and a re-evaluation of the way the department spends money and Congress provides it.

Clinton pledged to adopt all 29 recommendations from the review board, saying that many are already being implemented. But she insisted that diplomats must be able to travel and work in dangerous places in order to do their jobs.

The promises did not satisfy her toughest critics. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., called it “outrageous” that Clinton was not interviewed by the investigators who conducted the independent review.

“I was not asked to speak,” Clinton said, adding that she would have done so if the investigators had thought it important.

For the most part, questions from Democrats were prefaced with praise for Clinton’s tenure as secretary and focused on ways to improve diplomatic security. Republicans were harsher. Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., accused Clinton of “national security malpractice” for failing to better protect the temporary diplomatic post where Stevens died. “You let the consulate become a death trap,” Duncan thundered.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., greeted Clinton politely, but switched tone quickly, telling her “your answers are not satisfactory to me.”

He said that “numerous warnings” about militant activity in Libya were not addressed and that the State Department’s desire for a “soft footprint” in the country “was to some degree responsible for what took place.”

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he would have fired Clinton if he had been president, eliciting a gasp from one onlooker.

And Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., trying to pin Clinton down later in the day, observed, “everybody has their own CYA to do here.”

On a lighter note, Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, drew chuckles when he wished Clinton “the best in your future endeavors — mostly.”

The sessions took place the day before Kerry’s Senate hearing to replace Clinton as secretary. Clinton, who lost the Democratic nomination to President Obama in 2008, had always said she would serve only one term in his Cabinet.

Kerry, though still chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chose not to participate in the hearing to avoid the appearance of a conflict, aides said.

Clinton praised diplomats working in peril and on a shoestring, asking Congress to both free up existing funds and provide more money for security at high-risk embassies and other diplomatic posts worldwide.

As ambassador to Libya, Stevens had sent repeated cables to Washington seeking better security, a point raised by several Republicans during the two sessions. In the morning hearing before the Senate, Clinton said that she never saw the requests. “They did not come to me,” she said. “I did not approve them. I did not deny them.”

Even under sometimes tough questioning, Clinton visibly lost her temper only during the exchange with Sen. Ronald Johnson, R-Wis., when he asked Rice of “purposely misleading the American public” about events leading up to the Benghazi attack. Five days after the attacks, Rice said in television interviews that they grew out a spontaneous protest, not a planned terrorist operation. The view was later reversed by the administration.

Slamming the table and staring at Johnson, Clinton said: “Nothing could be further from the truth. The fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information.”

Clinton cast the attacks that killed Stevens, diplomat Sean Smith and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty as part of a larger rise of militancy across a vast swath of northern Africa and the Middle East. Linking the attacks loosely to the instability now on display in Mali and Algeria, Clinton said understanding and confronting that challenge transcends politics.

“We are in a new reality. We are trying to make sense of changes that nobody had predicted but which we’re going to have to live with,” she said. “Let’s be honest with ourselves. Let’s avoid turning everything into a political football.”

Clinton’s voice broke as she described receiving the caskets of the dead Americans at Joint Base Andrews a few days after the attacks.

“For me, this is not just a matter of policy. It’s personal,” she said, choking up. “I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews. I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the sons and daughters, and the wives left alone to raise their children.”