Letter: How Fortunate to Be ‘Suitable’

To the Editor:

I respond to William P. Walsh’s critique of Charlie Buttrey’s letter regarding a study on gun use and mortality. I quote Walsh quoting the study:

“The following quote gives one the impression that perhaps most of those in possession of a gun were of questionable status: ‘However, compared with control participants, shooting case participants were significantly more often Hispanic, more frequently working in high-risk occupations, less educated, and had a greater frequency of prior arrest. At the time of shooting, case participants were also significantly more often involved with alcohol and drugs, outdoors, and closer to areas where more blacks, Hispanics, and unemployed individuals resided. Case participants were also more likely to be located in areas with less income and more illicit drug trafficking.’ So we have a report concerning unsuitable people, engaged in unsuitable behavior, and associating with other unsuitable people. What has it to do with the ordinary law-abiding citizen? What has it to do with the purpose of the Second Amendment? I answer: nothing.”

I assume Walsh is an ordinary, suitable person, living in a suitable area, with culture and skin color completely different from those of the apparently invisible and fortunately safely distant miscreants and riffraff described in the study. I congratulate him on his (entirely deserved, I’m sure) safe, affluent environs untouched by alcohol or drug problems, containing only people who are employed, like himself, in indoor, low-risk occupations.

Margaret Richardson



Letter: Closer Reading of Gun Study

Sunday, May 5, 2013

To the Editor: I respond to Charlie Buttrey’s assertion that a 2009 article published in the American Journal of Public Health proved that, “People in possession of a gun are 4.5 times more likely to be shot in an assault than those without one” (“Firearms Don’t Save Lives,” May 3). I didn’t think the statement rang true, so I read …

Letter: Firearms Don’t Save Lives

Monday, April 29, 2013

To the Editor: In his letter to the April 28 Forum, “The Gun Vote in Hartford,” Arthur Peale wrote that “no one mentions the hundreds of thousands of lives saved or crimes deterred yearly by the use of guns.” There’s a simple reason for this. It’s simply not true. According to a study published in the New England Journal of …

Letter: My Meaning Was Misinterpreted

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

To the Editor: Margaret Richardson, in her May 28 letter (“How Fortunate to Be ‘Suitable,’”) appears to have taken my use of the word “unsuitable” as having a racist or otherwise prejudicial meaning. In fairness to her, I might have been better advised to use the word “ineligible” to make my point. The dictionary says “ineligible” has the same meaning …