Letter: Different Reading of Dorchester Email

To the Editor:

It continues to amaze me that people can read the same email and interpret the words in so many different ways. I, too, received the email announcement from Artie Burdette that so offended John Franz. I saw none of the information Franz related in his letter published March 14 (“Improper Use of Email”). This email neither “heaps praise on Selectman Hallock” nor “denigrates others who served in the past.” The email begins “Good News! Our Town has been notified by NH Homeland Security and Emergency Management, Division of Public Safety, that the project that we, the town, described and submitted for review has been determined to be eligible for the HSEM Hazardous Mitigation program.” It then goes on to give more details about the specifics of the grant and level of funding. It ends with, “This, of course, is a team effort. Special thanks must go to Steve Iacuzzi of LiTech, NH Senator Jeanne Forrester and our Select Board Chairman Sherman Hallock for their exceptional leadership and performance. Keep up the good work.”

I found this perfectly appropriate, as I know that these three had worked with the Dorchester Emergency Management Team headed by Artie Burdette to get this grant to this level of approval. I am sorry that Franz regarded this as promoting Sherman Hallock’s bid for re-election or in any way “denigrating others who served in the past” but just cannot agree with his conclusions.

Elizabeth A Trought



Letter: Improper Use of Email in Dorchester

Saturday, March 9, 2013

To the Editor: On March 8, I received a double email from Emergency Management Director and Selectman Artie Burdette. The email regarded the possibility of Dorchester receiving a mitigation grant for the North Dorchester Road. In the email, Burdette heaped praise on Selectman Sherman Hallock, who was an incumbent running for a second term, while at the same time denigrating …

Letter: Questionable Practice in Dorchester

Monday, March 25, 2013

To the Editor: In her March 21 letter (“Different Reading of Email”), Elizabeth Trought demonstrated her loyalty to her friends, the Dorchester selectmen. However, when she noted that different people “can read the same email and interpret the words in many different ways,” she totally missed the point of John Franz’ letter to which she was objecting. Franz had written …